Update: The Russian “anti-witnessing” (or anti-missionary) cases
December 27, 2016
(source: http://www.forum18.org/archive.php?article_id=2242)
SUMMARY: INCONSISTENCY OF “ANTI-MISSIONARY” PUNISHMENTS
Confusion and inconsistency mark decisions whether to prosecute individuals and religious organisations for sharing beliefs under the so-called”anti-missionary” punishments, which came into force in July, and what the outcome of court hearings is. Of 27 known prosecutions, 13 ended with convictions and fines so far.
A lack of consensus among judges appears to exist over whether the absence of written authorisation (which the amendment states that a person must carry if performing so-called “missionary activity” for an organisation or group) is itself evidence of an “offence” or proof of innocence.
A lack of consensus among judges appears to exist over whether the absence of written authorisation (which the amendment states that a person must carry if performing so-called “missionary activity” for an organisation or group) is itself evidence of an “offence” or proof of innocence.
Two Protestants on Moscow train
People whose public expression or sharing of their beliefs may fall foul of the “anti-missionary” amendment appear to be vulnerable to the actions of their fellow citizens as well as the attentions of law enforcement.
– Archbishop of Ukrainian Reformed Orthodox Church gave sermon at Messianic Jewish communityon 27 August; police detained him during sermon, having received a message [sms?] suggesting he was trying to convert Jews to Orthodoxy!
Georges